TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-02 > 1044129300


From: "Jackie" <>
Subject: [TMG] RE: WWI Draft tags (was TMG v5.04 - Adoptions)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:55:18 -0600
In-Reply-To: <36.380e8e71.2b6d7054@cs.com>


Teresa,

I think one tag with three sentences would work fine.

Right now I'm using these, but they leave out a lot. I've only found two
relatives with WWI draft registrations, so I didn't give it too much thought
yet. I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with.

Principle:
[:CR:][:TAB:][P] registered for the World War I draft <[D]> <[L]>.<[M].>
His nearest relative was listed as [R: Nearest Relative]

Nearest Relative:
[:CR:][:TAB:][R: Nearest Relative] was listed as the nearest relative on the
World War I draft registration of [P1] <[D]> <[L]>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 12:48 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [TMG] TMG v5.04 - Adoptions
>
>
> In a message dated 2/1/2003 12:45:45 PM Central Standard Time,
> writes:
>
>
> > I could use WWI draft cards!
> >
> > I really think it's great you contribute so much to this list.
> >
> > Jackie
> >
>
> Jackie,
> Great! Let me ask you this. I am thinking of doing them two
> ways. One for
> each draft registration, or just one for the whole draft time.
> In other words, there were (I think) three separate draft
> registrations for
> World War I. I am thinking of having three separate sentences.
> We can use
> the same tag, just different sentences. What do you think?
> Teresa Ghee Elliott
> <A
> HREF="http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/
> ">Need help with TMG sentences? Scroll to bottom of page</A>
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> Visit the TMG Tips web site <http://www.tmgtips.com>; for items of
> interest to TMG users.
>
>


This thread: