TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-02 > 1044147518


From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] dataset vs project
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 18:59:00 -0600
References: <158.1b2d089f.2b6c5d27@cs.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030201194143.0295a320@pop.compuserve.com>


I think that I would keep them in separate projects, perhaps each in their
own project, as long as you have no expectations of merging them. If,
however, you change you mind in the future there are ways to merge the
projects and then the data sets. No since cluttering up you main project
with data sets that have no relationship to it......


At 07:53 PM 2/1/2003 -0500, Karla Huebner wrote:
>All my own genealogy (including many unrelated people associated with my
>ancestors) is in one dataset in 4.0d; these others are discrete sets that
>I have no expectation of ever wanting to merge with one another.

Paul E. Lawrence


My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm

Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
Hardy, Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, Towne, Kincaid, and Rose, and others.

User of The Master Genealogist (TMG) http://www.whollygenes.com/index.htm

Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/

This thread: