TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-03 > 1046550959


From: "Darrell A. Martin" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Places - a TMG wishlist item for v.6
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:35:59 -0600
In-Reply-To: <14e.1c665577.2b926c58@cs.com>


At 03:04 PM 3/1/03 -0500, wrote:
>In a message dated 3/1/2003 11:56:27 AM Central Standard Time,
> writes:
>
>
> >
> > I have an aversion to creating two Place Records for what is undoubtedly a
> > single place. For example, Flamstead, New Hampshire, chartered in 1754,
> was
> > at a later time *also* (concurrently!) under New York administration, in
> > Cumberland County.
>
>See, I am the exact opposite.
>I have 77 places that are in Rutherford County, TN. What I wish was there
>was some way when I said show all events attached to places in TN, it would
>show ALL the events that have TN in the state field. And when I said show
>all events attached to places in Rutherford County, TN, it would show all
>events with Rutherford County in the County and TN in the state. And so
>forth.
>But once we can do a list of places, I figure I will be able to work around
>it, so I wait. <G>
>I use places to describe in great detail where something happened, so I might
>have 3rd Civil District, Rutherford County, TN and 10th Civil District,
>Rockvale, Rutherford County, TN. They are both in Rutherford County, but the
>are two very distinct areas of the county, and families from one Civil
>District would probably not known people from the other. But if I want to
>find all events in Rutherford County, these events won't be in the list.
>Hope I am making it clear.
>Teresa Ghee Elliott

Hi, Teresa:

But I can do what I think you are saying, *now*, in version 4.0d. The
arrival of the CRW LOP report with ver. 5.05 (if I have it correct that the
CRW with LOP is in there) will provide that for v.5 as well. Am I missing
something that you are asking for?

Darrell


Darrell Allen MARTIN
a native Vermonter currently in exile in Addison, Illinois
www.darrell-martin.net/genealogy/


This thread: