TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2003-03 > 1046640457
From: "Darrell A. Martin" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Re: CRW vs RDS
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:27:43 -0600
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20030302145018.00a1da00@pop.sprynet.com><5.1.0.14.2.20030302135324.02cc83d0@pop3.citlink.net><5.1.0.14.0.20030302133221.00a4c040@pop.sprynet.com><03b301c2e0dd$ec490d80$020aa8c0@library><5.1.0.14.0.20030301143401.00a31da0@pop.sprynet.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030302150317.02d6fdf8@pop3.citlink.net>
At 03:05 PM 3/2/03 -0600, Paul E. Lawrence wrote:
>The end results are the same in that your report will be
>generated...probably depends on your definition of "functionality"...they
>are different but similar...RDS has no Wizard as CRW did so there is a
>"functionality" difference there....
>
>At 02:51 PM 3/2/2003 -0600, Darrell A. Martin wrote:
>>I understand that as a menu rearrangement (which I like, BTW), rather
>>than as a major change in functionality overall. Correct?
>
>Paul E. Lawrence
Paul:
That won't matter to me. Gandalf I like, Radagast is OK, Saruman is a
wretch.... Wizards I can do without, for the most part.
Darrell
Darrell Allen MARTIN
a native Vermonter currently in exile in Addison, Illinois
www.darrell-martin.net/genealogy/
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Re: CRW vs RDS by "Darrell A. Martin" <> |