TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-04 > 1049474650


From: "myrnice" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.05, Role Filter buglet
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:44:13 -0500
References: <001001c2f8fd$3c8ec8c0$30db32d2@good> <006b01c2f927$cf4e9670$d7b9fea9@MYRNICE> <000701c2fa9e$272afa60$935732d2@good>


Astrid

It has been reported as being fixed already but you will not see it until
the next release.

Myrnice

"Astrid Kranzbuhler" wrote on Friday, April 04, 2003 6:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.05, Role Filter buglet


> Myrnice wrote:
> > I get a different result but it is a problem. I am asked to provide a
> table
> > (which I have no idea which one it is asking for) and then I get the
same
> > number of individuals that were already in the PE. If you run the second
> one
> > first you may see what I mean.
> >
> > I will report this to the developers.
>
> Sorry, Myrnice,
> I somehow missed your response yesterday.
> Actually, I did run the second option first (see below). It was only when
I
> got the error message that I tried the other option which works fine.
> Thanks for reporting it,
> Astrid
>
> > > However, if I filter instead for:
> > > Field: (any tag)
> > > Subfield: Role
> > > Operator: Does not equal 'Principal or Witness' (= somewhere down the
> > list)
> > > I get:
> > > ErrorMarker:Function name is missing ). 96 XFILTERFILE_EROLE

This thread: