TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-07 > 1057117894


From: "Kathleen Perelli" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Begeman Census (cont)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:51:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <ba.422bfdcc.2c33a509@aol.com>


Patt, Teresa,

Thanks, Teresa - I have your site book marked and will definitely use it,
but will settle for orderly progression at the moment per a good suggestion,
Patt.

I will share some screens and output with you in the next day or so. We can
go from there.

Many thanks to both of you.
Kathleen

-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 10:01 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Begeman Census (cont)


In a message dated 7/1/2003 7:56:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:

> I, too, used Family Roots, then Roots IV (terrible) and "began" TMG in
> 1998.
> What little time I had I mostly did research and piled up more papers.
> Thanks to some ?TMG software or my system problems? in Fall 2000, I once
> again became derailed, then a hard drive crash last fall. Hopefully I'm
up
> and running for good now.

I've never had a problem with TMG and have been totally satisfied. It has
alot of the things that FR was going to implement.


> When you get this working to your satisfaction. The next step is to
> incorporate the relationship into the sentence. This isn't relavant to the
> 1850, 1860
> or 1870 census but becomes important after that. And since your working on
> 1930
> censuses you'll probably want to get it right the first time.
>
> Question:
> I am starting to enter some data. Should I know this at this time?

I think you should make sure you're getting the output correct with what we
gone over so far. When you feel comfortable with that and the output is Ok
then
we'll add some roles. It should take that much time to add the roles later
because the basic sentences will be there. You're really not going to change
the
memo just add a role. But since you had trouble at the outset its probably
better not to do it all at once <g>

Patt


==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to <>.




This thread: