TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-11 > 1067798940


From: "Teresa Ghee Elliott" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] LOP Report using selection from PE
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:49:06 -0600
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031102133420.02a5d230@incoming.verizon.net>


Walt,
I always find step three to be: Go to bed and get a good night's
sleep. Then in the morning you won't remember why it bothered you so
much the night before. <G>

Teresa Ghee Elliott
For Rutherford County TN Cemeteries
www.Rutherfordcemeteries.home-page.org
For TMG sentences
www.tmgsentences.home-page.org


-----Original Message-----
From: Walt [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 12:40 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] LOP Report using selection from PE

At 12:32 PM 2/11/2003, Jill Morelli wrote:
>Virginia,
>
>Good possibility. However, while that could be a cause, it is not the
>case here.....I selected based on ID # and I have double checked it
>(actually triple checked) exactly what you are suggesting.
>
>I also exited the program and came back in and redid the whole report
>virtually start to finish. This time I had 21 different ID # selected
and
>17 showed up. The same four folks did not appear.
>
>Any other ideas? I finally gave up and manually entered the data for
the
>4 "missing" folks, so I am asking a "rhetorical" question and not one
that
>can address an pressing existing problem.


Jill

I agree with your first step of leaving TMG and then restarting and
trying
again.

After that my next step would be to run the maintenance routines.

If that doesn't do it, reboot your computer.

If that doesn't do it, then start worrying, cussing, and last but not
least, of course, writing to the list. <grin>

Walt



==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to <>.



This thread: