TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2003-11 > 1068109266


From: "William M Roberts" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] LOP Report using selection from PE
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 04:01:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <002001c3a3fc$f54a7710$6501a8c0@fran>


When you do a List of People report you may get the same person more
than once depending on how many name tags they have. For example if a
person has a primary Name-Var tag in the upper right corner and a
Name-Mar tag they will show up in the selection as 2 names. They will
only show up as 1 person on the output. This is as designed.

Myrnice

Fran Segall wrote on Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:29 PM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [TMG] LOP Report using selection from PE
>
> Back in May, I reported this bug to WG. It was confirmed by Jim
Byram,
> and was able to be reproduced using the sample project. It seems to
> occur (at least for me) when the names selected in the PE extend above
> the PE window and some of the selected names are scrolled off the top
of
> the list. As with your situation, it always seemed to drop 5 people -
> the 2nd through 6th people selected. I'm not sure what version we were
> on then, but the problem has not yet been corrected...hopefully in the
> next release.
>
> Please report your error to WG support - as confirmation AND a
reminder!
>
> Fran
>
Jill Morelli wrote on Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:21 AM
> To:
> Subject: [TMG] LOP Report using selection from PE
>
> Good morning,
>
> I am trying to generate a List of People report using selections from
> the Project Explorer. I have 20 names selected but only 15 are
showing
> up on the report (generated twice independently...same results)
>
> So I went ahead with the 15 and ran the report.
>
> Then I "deselected" the 15 from the list, reselected the same 5 and
ran
> the report again....1 showed up. I can't see anything special about
> these 5....the 20 were a mix of primary and non-primary names and that
> didn't seem to make a difference. They were in the first part of the
> list but not the top 5, for instance.
>
> What am I missing here?
>
> Jill


This thread: