TMG-L Archives

From: "Kathryn Bassett" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Still Aging After Burial
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:02:22 -0800
In-Reply-To: <002701c3e793$cd5f00b0$c8c88a3f@ron>

I assume you have no death, so is your burial tag marked as primary?

--
Kathryn Rhinehart Bassett (Pasadena CA)
"Genealogy is my bag" "GH is my soap"

http://bassett.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Chenier [mailto:]
> Sent: 30 Jan 2004 4:47:PM
> To:
> Subject: [TMG] Still Aging After Burial
>
>
> Now here is something really funny:
>
> I have a relative who was born 12 Jan 1918.
> He dies 11 Jan 2000, TMG says he was 81 years old (one day shy of his (82nd)
> birth
> date).
> He is buried 13 Jan 2000, TMG says he is now 82 years old now!
>
> Is there something wrong with TMG's calculations of age at burial?
> Shouldn't TMG stop the aging process at the age of death?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ron Chénier

This thread:

• RE: [TMG] Still Aging After Burial by "Kathryn Bassett" <>