TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2004-04 > 1080857651


From: Lorna McIntosh <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Carriage Returns
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:14:20 +1200
In-Reply-To: <200441152447.582727@TERRY2>


Hi Laurie ,

Like Terry, I too started creating a few copies of the tags I used most
often that I wanted new para versions of, but am gradually switching those
into roles instead as I find it a bit of a pain if I ever want to limit the
tags output in anyway.
So I'm aiming at fewer tags, more roles.
But also bowing to the pragmatic approach of just overwriting the sentence
at the local level for the tag to insert the required new para there, even
though I also try to avoid local sentences even more than I try to avoid
growing my tag list.

Lorna McIntosh
Waikanae, NZ
Family Tree on web at http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/lornahen/
Rootsweb (http://wc.rootsweb.com) Jump to database LornaHenderson

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Reigel [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, 2 April 2004 8:25 a.m.
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Carriage Returns

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:52:34 -0500, Laurie Jones Williams wrote:

> In order to make a narrative easier to read I would like
> to break it up into logical sections. This I done, using
> sort dates to have all the religious tags together, then
> the education tags, then the employment tags, etc. I
> want to separate these topics into separate paragraphs.
> Since each individual is different and therefore wouldn't
> have the same tags, the carriage return code would not
> necessarily be in the same tag, i.e. baptism.
>
> I see two options:

This thread: