TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2004-05 > 1083465842


From: "Teresa Ghee Elliott" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] OPTIMIZING PLACES
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 21:48:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <021b01c42fee$d36f1190$6401a8c0@charliexv>


County Name: Rutherford County, TN
Book: Direct and Indirect Indexes to Trust Deeds 1864-1890, C 1890-1895, D
1905-1908, E 1910-1910 and F 1912-1914
Roll Number: 001
Archives: Tennessee State Library and Archives
City: Nashville
State: Tennessee

I put one in as a place attached to a tag, and the other in as a repository.
I now have three instances of this place in my data set.
Teresa Ghee Elliott
Any information I give that you can't find in your version of TMG 5.1 is
probably due to customization on my part.
For Rutherford County TN Cemeteries www.Rutherfordcemeteries.home-page.org
For TMG sentences
<http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/TMG.html>;

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Byram [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 9:40 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] OPTIMIZING PLACES

Teresa,

> Places will not combine using OPTIMIZE if the data in a place field is
more
> than 100 characters. Even if the place styles, start and end dates,
> comments and all other fields are exactly alike, they will not combine if
> you have a place field with more than 100 characters.

Just tried it and two places of much more than 100 characters optimized and
combined just fine. Give me a place to test.

Jim



==== TMG Mailing List ====
To un-subscribe from TMG-L (in MAIL mode), send a message to
<> [to <> in Digest
mode] with just the word "unsubscribe" (no quotes)in the text and turn off
your signature.




This thread: