TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2004-05 > 1083466499


From: "Teresa Ghee Elliott" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] OPTIMIZING PLACES
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 21:59:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040501215145.011d33d0@pop3.citlink.net>


Nope,
Every thing is exactly the same. In the places that I have that won't
optimize they all have they same thing and that is 100+ characters in a data
field.

Teresa Ghee Elliott
Any information I give that you can't find in your version of TMG 5.1 is
probably due to customization on my part.
For Rutherford County TN Cemeteries www.Rutherfordcemeteries.home-page.org
For TMG sentences
<http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/TMG.html>;

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E. Lawrence [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 9:52 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [TMG] OPTIMIZING PLACES

At 09:48 PM 5/1/2004 -0500, Teresa Ghee Elliott wrote:
>I put one in as a place attached to a tag, and the other in as a
repository.
>I now have three instances of this place in my data set.

Do they have differenct Place Styles? They won't combine if their Place
Styles are different....


Paul E. Lawrence


My Lawrence Genealogy web page is located at the following URL:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm

User of The Master Genealogist (TMG) http://www.whollygenes.com/index.htm

Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/


==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to <>.




This thread: