TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-02 > 1107337047


From: Allen Mellen <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Julian vs Gregorian and OS vs NS
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 04:37:27 -0500
References: <20050202043219.56439.qmail@web60301.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050202043219.56439.qmail@web60301.mail.yahoo.com>


From the titles of the references in this article, it is clear that the
particular questions being addressed here are not covered in the
cited sources in this particular Wikipedia article. Also, the article
does not address the question Joan originally raised -- what is a source to
help her interpret old documents that bear dates that do not fit to the
general explanations.

At 11:32 PM 2/1/2005, Cheryl Barnett wrote:
>Quite the contrary! The Wikipedia entry on Gregorian vs. Julian calendar
>properly
>cites 7 sources with ISBN and 4 online references. If you're not familiar
>with the
>Wikipedia, I encourage you to check it out.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar#Julian_and_Gregorian_calendars
>
>
>Joan wote:
> > It's surprised me that this list could have a discussion of a
> >complex subject like calendars without citing any sources other than
> things on
> >the web, none of which have any citations to scholarly sources.
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
>http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Send all messages and replies to <>.


This thread: