TMG-L Archives

From: "vbc" <>
Subject: FW: [TMG] Relationship report
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:03:39 -0500

Hi, I didn't get any responses to my post. Can someone please tell me if
this looks like a bug? Since I couldn't attach the chart, I tried to
represent what it looks like.

Thanks,
Virginia C.

-----Original Message-----
From: vbc [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 11:15 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [TMG] Relationship report

I just ran a Relationship report on someone related to me in two ways (with
the "Show closest relationship only" option unchecked. I got a strange
combination of the two relationships:

Common ancestor

Siblings
Wylanta Annie (g-grandmother)
James (spouse)

1st cousins
William (subject)

2nd cousins


3rd cousins
Virginia (Me)

Siblings Rebecca (3g-grandmother)


1st cousins
James
Wylanta (spouse)

2nd cousins
William (subject) Annie (g-grandmother)

3rd cousins


4th cousins


5th cousins
Virginia (Me)


The relationships are correct EXCEPT that the second "Siblings" are attached
to the first "3rd cousins" so that it looks like Rebecca is my descendant!
There is no common ancestor shown for this second relationship. And only one
relationship is noted in text at the end of the chart: William is the 2nd
cousin 3 times removed of Virginia.


(Wylanta and James are 1st cousins 1 time removed.)

This looks like a bug to me. I'm using V.6. I don't recall what this
looked like in V. 5.

Virginia C.

This thread:

• OT VA COUNTIES by "Teresa Elliott" <>
  • Exhibit Log Problem by "Kay Barnes" <>
    • Relationship report by Peter Wilson <>
      • Re: [TMG] Relationship report by "Fran Anderson" <>
      • Re: [TMG] Relationship report by "Fran Anderson" <>
        • Re: [TMG] Relationship report by "Cheryl Freeman" <>
      • RE: [TMG] Relationship report by "vbc" <>

      • FW: [TMG] Relationship report by "vbc" <>