TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-05 > 1115145802


From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Bibliography - IGI Entries
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:43:22 -0700
References: <20050428172537.96225.qmail@web30808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <BAY7-DAV31DB2DBE5DCD214C7F4A41B7180@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY7-DAV31DB2DBE5DCD214C7F4A41B7180@phx.gbl>


Dear Stuart,
Thanks for pointing this out. I will be altering my IGI Source Type (again!)
to reflect this information. Boy, another one of those threads that gets way
beyond the original question, thank heavens!
Doreen Neilley
Quoting Stuart Armstrong <>:

> Excellent, Tom!
>
> I would like to point out also that the IGI has two types of entries:
> Extracted records (extracted by teams from original records)
> Member submitted records (which are completely undocumented -- even the
> name of the submitter is not always given).
>
> Obviously there is a great difference in quality between the two types. The
> extracted records are extracted by people who don't necessarily have much
> experience, but they are checked by a supervisor who also reviews the same
> originals, or photocopies or images thereof. The experience of the extraction
> team varies. But at least these are somewhat reliable because they do come
> from original sources and require collaboration of two people before they are
> accepted.
>
> The second category, submitted records, is just some unknown and often
> un-named researcher's assertion of what he or she thinks is fact, without any
> documentation and often without any direct way of knowing whether the
> submitter knew anything at all, or actually researched it or just guessed. My
> own research of Mexican records is revealing that as many as two thirds of
> the member submitted Birth, Marriage, and Death dates found in the IGI for my
> wife's family are wrong!
>
> In my Master Source List, I have four different sources for the IGI.
> IGI: Extracted record.
> IGI: Membership record.
> IGI: Submitted record.
> IGI: Ordinance record.
>
> Membership records are another category, taken from church membership rolls
> of deceased persons. I do not know much about these, about how the member
> information found on FamilySearch.com is compiled, but I suspect their
> reliability is somewhere between that of extracted and submitted records.
> Church membership records are kept in Salt Lake, copies in the individual
> wards. The master records are updated whenever the Ward Clerk submits a
> correction. Having been a ward membership clerk myself, I know that it is
> often very difficult to obtain accurate information about a member, for a
> variety of reasons, so these records are not as accurate as one would like
> them to be.
>
> Ordinance records are only of interest to LDS researchers, except that in
> order for the ordinances to be performed there must be certain
> Birth/Christening, Marriage, or Death/Burial information submitted. This
> vital information then would have the same reliability as submitted records
> (meaning, not much), whereas the ordinance information itself comes from
> church documentation of temple ordinances and should be considered a primary
> source (primary for the ordinance events only, not for the auxiliary BMD
> information).
>
><snip>>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com<http://mail.yahoo.com/>;
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> To un-subscribe from TMG-L (in MAIL mode), send a message to
> <<mailto:>> [to
> <<mailto:>> in Digest
> mode] with just the word "unsubscribe" (no quotes)in the text and turn off
> your signature.
>
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> The Wholly Genes FAQ page
> <http://www.whollygenes.com/faq1/fom-serve/cache/1.html>; has information not
> only about TMG and how to obtain it, but helpful hints on using it.
>
>




This thread: