TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-07 > 1120206600


From: "Astrid Kranzbuhler" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] unknow age at death -
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 18:30:00 +1000
In-Reply-To: <20050630.161336.1740.0.deblack@juno.com>


Actually, for using the 'exact age' variable with roles, the correct
variable is:

[RE:DECEASED]

The [AE] variable is correct for the current principal when not using the
role variable.

So you could have either:
[RF:DECEASED] died [D] <[L]> at age [RE:DECEASED]

Or

[RF:DECEASED] died [D] <[L]> at age [AE]

either will give you the age of the principal (in this case in the role of
DECEASED) if at least one of the dates is incomplete.

Astrid

DeAnne E Cole wrote:
> [RAE:DECEASED] - did not work
> Iswitched to principal for him and have [P] died <[D]> <[L]> <[A]>
> it will not print an age at death -
> DeAnne
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:49:58 -0700 "DeAnna Burghart"
> <>
> writes:
> > Try [RAE:DECEASED]
> >
> > Though listed as 'age exact' it actually counts the age from
> > whatever
> > information is given, making that a bit of a misnomer. In my own
> > head, I
> > call it 'age estimate' instead. ;P
> >
> > DeAnna

This thread: