TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-07 > 1120240564


From: "DeAnna Burghart" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] unknow age at death -
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:56:13 -0700
In-Reply-To: <42A0B1C1008EEC48@smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au> (added by postmaster@iprimus.com.au)


Ahaha. Thank you, Astrid. You'd think I'd look at my own stupid cheat sheets
... (In my defense, they were still packed. I just dug them out.)

Sorry for the confusion, DeAnne.

DeAnna

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DeAnna Burghart
TMG Shortcuts, Variables and Report Cheat Sheets (Word and PDF)
http://members.cox.net/danieleb765/genealogy/


-----Original Message-----
From: Astrid Kranzbuhler [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 1:30 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [TMG] unknow age at death -


Actually, for using the 'exact age' variable with roles, the correct
variable is:

[RE:DECEASED]

The [AE] variable is correct for the current principal when not using the
role variable.

So you could have either:
[RF:DECEASED] died [D] <[L]> at age [RE:DECEASED]

Or

[RF:DECEASED] died [D] <[L]> at age [AE]

either will give you the age of the principal (in this case in the role of
DECEASED) if at least one of the dates is incomplete.

Astrid

DeAnne E Cole wrote:
> [RAE:DECEASED] - did not work
> Iswitched to principal for him and have [P] died <[D]> <[L]> <[A]>
> it will not print an age at death -
> DeAnne
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 09:49:58 -0700 "DeAnna Burghart"
> <>
> writes:
> > Try [RAE:DECEASED]
> >
> > Though listed as 'age exact' it actually counts the age from
> > whatever
> > information is given, making that a bit of a misnomer. In my own
> > head, I
> > call it 'age estimate' instead. ;P
> >
> > DeAnna


==== TMG Mailing List ====
To un-subscribe from TMG-L (in MAIL mode), send a message to
<> [to <> in Digest
mode] with just the word "unsubscribe" (no quotes)in the text and turn off
your signature.

This thread: