TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-08 > 1123256710


From: "Jim Byram" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:45:10 -0400
References: <351F89D30B94074CA4EF76696E56411301B7D9C6@susday234.corp.ncr.com>


Kevin,

> In reviewing this report and looking at the ID for the MIN and MAX I
> have found that step or adopted children become a part of the age at
> first child and age at last child categories. Should it not be only
> biological children for this to be accurate?

TMG doesn't care what a child-parent relationship tag is named for its
operations. As Teresa said, the only meaningful characteristic is whether
the tag is primary or not. The different named variants for child-parent
relationship tags are effectively only synonyms for the user's information
and for the user to be able to differentiate between the different
relationships.

Jim



For example I have a
> mother that had a "step" child at age 11, I know that age 11 is very
> young for children, but because I had a tag for a step child it give a
> false / positive result.
>
> Opinions / Comments ?
>
> Thank you for your time,
> Kevin L. Sholder
>
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> Send all messages and replies to <>.
>

This thread: