TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-08 > 1123259273


From: Eric Haas <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:27:53 -0400
References: <351F89D30B94074CA4EF76696E56411301B7D9C6@susday234.corp.ncr.com>
In-Reply-To: <351F89D30B94074CA4EF76696E56411301B7D9C6@susday234.corp.ncr.com>


Friday, August 5, 2005, 10:53:49 AM, Sholder, Kevin L wrote:

SKL> All,

SKL> In reviewing this report and looking at the ID for the MIN and MAX I
SKL> have found that step or adopted children become a part of the age at
SKL> first child and age at last child categories. Should it not be only
SKL> biological children for this to be accurate? For example I have a
SKL> mother that had a "step" child at age 11, I know that age 11 is very
SKL> young for children, but because I had a tag for a step child it give a
SKL> false / positive result.

SKL> Opinions / Comments ?


If you take a non-bio relationship tag and make it primary, you are
telling TMG to treat it just like a biological relationship.

This thread: