TMG-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] "After" dates
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 03:48:16 EST

In a message dated 01/11/2005 04:47:29 GMT Standard Time,
writes:

>First, a partial date of 1801, which needs to have some defaults
>applied (UFT would treat it by creating a sort date of 1801.06.15, as
>I recall -- for any missing field, it would pick the middle of the
>range; if the month is missing, it would arbitrarily pick June, for a
>missing day, the 15th).


Not arguing with this - just a comment - in UFT this would cause the
following to happan. If you have a baptism date of 14th March 1821 and entered it
as such but then entered the year of birth as 1821 UFT aotomatically entered
the sort date for the birth as 15th July 1821 and sorted the baptism entry
before the birth.

Judith

This thread:

• Re: [TMG] "After" dates by