TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2005-11 > 1130871687
From: <>
Subject: Oldest son was Re: Re: [TMG] "After" dates
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:01:27 -0500
Dean,
I once saw a genealogy done by a woman claiming to be the only child of an only child, of an only child back to this one ancestor where (supposedly) she could inherit a large sum of money. She states that she's in this long run of only children and she alone is due the inheritance.
Then at the end of the article, she states that it's possible her husband is an heir too. (HUH???)
Teresa Ghee Elliott
>
> From: Dean Scribner <>
> Date: 2005/11/01 Tue AM 10:32:17 EST
> To:
> Subject: Re: [TMG] "After" dates
>
> When I see an incomplete date, it means exactly what I interpret it to
> mean. When I enter an incomplete date, it sorts exactly where I tell it
> to sort. When I have a pair of twins, each claiming to be the eldest
> son, I am faced with a difficult decision. Otherwise, no problem.
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> TMG v6.04 has been released. Check the Wholly Genes web site <http://www.whollygenes.com> for more information.
>
>
This thread:
| Oldest son was Re: Re: [TMG] "After" dates by <> |