TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-01 > 1136244612


From: "Sue Richart" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Citation for a Canadian patent help requested
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:30:12 -0800
In-Reply-To: <43B9804C.5090806@verizon.net>


Bob,

I used the phrase of Mills' Tax Roll example. She listed a 1796 Tax Digest.
My mistake in terminology.

>Neither Mills nor TMG have a Tax Digest example; did you use the Tax
>Roll? And since the patent number and not the person is probably the
>important item in searching for the patent, the should be first and not
>the patentee.

Good point on the order of search. I don't know one way or the other on the
numbering system, but from the photocopy it looks like the number is given
and then it is approved or denied.

>And since the patent number and not the person is probably the
>important item in searching for the patent, the should be first and not
>the patentee.

>The USA Used to assign a series of numbers to Patents pending (found an
>article with patent pending and a number.) and separate series to
>Patents. Canada may have just assigned a number for one series and
>designated the, as Patents Pending and Patents Granted. I would use that
>term with the patent Number.

>bob gillis

Thanks for the help. It is really nice to discuss this with others to come
up with a good solution.

Sue



This thread: