TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-02 > 1138925848


From: Terry Reigel <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] RE: Wish List: Sorting Tags
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:17:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20060202223810.26505.qmail@web81805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>


On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:38:10 -0800 (PST), Donald Joseph Schulteis
wrote:

> Chris is suggesting that the user no longer be concerned
> with a sort date. He is suggesting that this tag
> positioning be at the user's direction but caused by the
> program. We no longer have a sort date, we have an
> internal positioning value controlled by the program.
>
> When the added tag contains a date, it be positioned as
> is presently done.

Just how would that be done? Say you have the following tags, in this
order:

1. Tag A, date 1850
2. Tag B, no date (positioned by user)
3. Tag C, date 1830 (re-positioned by user)
4. Tag D, no date (positioned by user)
5. Tag E, date 1870

Now we add a tag with date 1860. Where would the system position it
"as is presently done"?

Terry Reigel

This thread: