TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-02 > 1138937001


From: Donald Joseph Schulteis <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] RE: Wish List: Sorting Tags
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:23:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200622191728.720593@Terry3>


The program ignores tags 2-4 as they have been positioned out-of-date sequence and positions it after tag #1 or before tage #5. If the user doesn't like the position, they drag and drop it to where it should be just as they would change the sort date today if they don't like it..

Donald

Terry Reigel <> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:38:10 -0800 (PST), Donald Joseph Schulteis
wrote:

> Chris is suggesting that the user no longer be concerned
> with a sort date. He is suggesting that this tag
> positioning be at the user's direction but caused by the
> program. We no longer have a sort date, we have an
> internal positioning value controlled by the program.
>
> When the added tag contains a date, it be positioned as
> is presently done.

Just how would that be done? Say you have the following tags, in this
order:

1. Tag A, date 1850
2. Tag B, no date (positioned by user)
3. Tag C, date 1830 (re-positioned by user)
4. Tag D, no date (positioned by user)
5. Tag E, date 1870

Now we add a tag with date 1860. Where would the system position it
"as is presently done"?

Terry Reigel


==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to .





"The Omnibus Portal"
www.schulteis.com/omnibus/

This thread: