TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-03 > 1141335890


From: bob gillis <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Omissions
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:44:50 -0500
References: <002c01c63e3f$417cfd90$6400a8c0@D9B30B81>


Lynn Rudberg wrote:

>Perhaps my hopes are unrealistic but here goes: When I input data and then look at the individual narrative or journal reports, I often find I need to place the omission sign (-) at the county or state level element so that the narrative is not redundant and is more readable.
>

I understand why you do that and I do likewise .

> However, that means that the pedigree charts (and I suspect the box charts too) have incomplete data regarding places. Is there a way to work around this or must I deal with each narrative report by deleting the redundant place elements in Word
>

But why do you want the full place in a pedigree or chart? Either
still shows the full place in the birth/baptism and only the Detail/City
in the other Tags.

bob gillis

This thread: