TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2006-03 > 1141340374
From: "Karenhappuch" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Omissions
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:59:34 -0700
References: <002c01c63e3f$417cfd90$6400a8c0@D9B30B81>
I don't think it can be done with TMG reports. Am I correct that you would
like a report option to show excluded places?
In SecondSite there is an option in the place index to "show excluded
places". I really like that option. There should be such an option in TMG
reports.
Barbara
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynn Rudberg" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 2:21 PM
Subject: [TMG] Omissions
> Perhaps my hopes are unrealistic but here goes: When I input data and
> then look at the individual narrative or journal reports, I often find I
> need to place the omission sign (-) at the county or state level element
> so that the narrative is not redundant and is more readable. However,
> that means that the pedigree charts (and I suspect the box charts too)
> have incomplete data regarding places. Is there a way to work around this
> or must I deal with each narrative report by deleting the redundant place
> elements in Word?
> Thanks for any help.
> Lynn in IL
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Omissions by "Karenhappuch" <> |