TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-04 > 1143925550


From: "Jill Morelli" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Bibliography question
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:05:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: <200641153426.233372@Terry3>


Terry,

True, I guess I don't consider the roll number the level of detail that was
being requested for inclusion. And like you say, unless you include it in
the source itself it's not going to print....clumpers beware.

Jill



-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Reigel [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:34 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [TMG] Bibliography question

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:45:19 -0800, Jill Morelli wrote:

> My understanding of the Bibliography is that, by design,
> it is not to be at the detail you are desiring.
> Bibliography are the "shopping list" of all the sources
> and the footnote is the specifics. So even if you were
> using the default census tag, there is no mechanism for
> the inclusion of the detail.
>
> Evidence! And Mill's Quicksheet both leave out the detail.

Evidence! does include the roll number, but not the household name.
The default census source type follows that lead and includes the
roll.

Terry Reigel



==== TMG Mailing List ====
The Wholly Genes FAQ page
<http://www.whollygenes.com/faq1/fom-serve/cache/1.html>; has information not
only about TMG and how to obtain it, but helpful hints on using it.

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.4/299 - Release Date: 3/31/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.4/299 - Release Date: 3/31/2006


This thread: