TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-05 > 1146933456


From: "Gilles Pinet" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Re: Cost of TMG
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:37:36 -0300
In-Reply-To: <005201c6710f$7a470280$0300a8c0@karen>


Karen,

I agree with you that the price is good, but now I afraid that Bob will
read your message, and start charging $250 (Grin!!!). I am new (two
weeks old) to TMG, but I love the filter functions, the reporting
features, the way sources are handle. I have done enough programming to
know that it is not a small task to develop a database system as well as
implement into the system mechanism to make to whole system extremely
flexible to adapt to almost everybodies needs. TMG reminds me of the
good old days of WordPerfect glories.... Everybody swore by it, and
hooked to it after they understood the reveal codes.

Definitely, keep up the good work,

Gilles Pinet
Dieppe, NB



-----Original Message-----
From: Karen McKellar [mailto:]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 10:18 AM
To:
Subject: [TMG] Re: Cost of TMG


I'm a firm believer in the old saying "you get what you pay for." Quite

frankly, I don't even remember what I paid for TMG, but it certainly was

worth the investment. I don't know what the current price is, but I
would
be willing to pay an equivalent as to that I paid for "Acrobat" which I
believe was around $250. I like being able to get the upgrades at no
cost
as it keeps me current.

Having Bob and his staff only an e-mail away (and usually a return phone

call within a matter of hours), makes it even more valuable to me as
well as
being able to make suggestions on upgrades only enhances its usability
(is
that a word?).

Keep up the good work.

Karen





==== TMG Mailing List ====
To un-subscribe from TMG-L (in MAIL mode), send a message to
<> [to <> in Digest
mode or to in Index mode] with just the word
"unsubscribe" (no quotes)in the text and turn off your signature.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.5/333 - Release Date:
2006-05-05


This thread: