TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2006-06 > 1149195606
From: "Ron Chenier" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Relationship (slightly O/T)
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 17:00:06 -0400
References: <000601c685a2$183db050$6501a8c0@LindaHome> <001301c685a5$be5e31a0$bd3c1d46@ron> <004401c685b8$99ef6ec0$0400a8c0@Laptop1>
Hi Norb,
Yes, you're right there. Bad choice of words in my previous message. Its
just that because my Indian ancestor is so far away in the line that the
relationship "seems" less than those that are nearer today.
I know without her I would not be here, so yes, I do owe my existance to
her.
Cheers,
Ron Chénier
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norb Bankert" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Relationship (slightly O/T)
>
>> Well Linda, I guess being 1/1424th OR 712th part Indian is not a very
>> significant impact on my life or my family tree.
>
> On the contrary. Run a straight line descendant tree from your Indian
> ancestor to yourself and you will realize that if your Indian ancestor did
> not have children you could not exist. Your Indian ancestor is just as
> important to your very existence as your own mother and father.
>
> Norb Bankert
> Family and Genealogy pages at www.bankert.org
>
>
> ==== TMG Mailing List ====
> Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Relationship (slightly O/T) by "Ron Chenier" <> |