TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-08 > 1154439102


From: "Michael J. Hannah" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Merging Datasets
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:31:42 -0600
References: <200607311500.k6VF0PFq024896@lists5.rootsweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <200607311500.k6VF0PFq024896@lists5.rootsweb.com>


On 7/31/2006 Terry Reigel <> wrote:
> By experiment, it appears there is a problem. :-(
> It appears you have suggested a scenario that's not expected by the
> design. I'll report the issue.

Thanks for your response to my questions, Terry, somehow
I knew you would know <grin>

While you are reporting things about merging <smile>
it is very nice that when there is a duplicate name of
custom source types, but the underlying definitions are
different, the sending name is modified and then merged so
that the differences are not lost. It would seem to
be more consistent with Bob Velke's philosophy to not ever
lose customer data or customizations if both styles and
modified tag types behaved like this also. Just a wish.

Michael

This thread: